OversightKit
EU AI Act Human Oversight — design who can stop the system
OversightKit drafts the EU AI Act Article 14 and 26(2) human-oversight design — who can stop the system, the override path, and the named-overseer gaps you still need to close. It produces a design draft, not an appointed overseer.
Paste how you use AI. Get an Art. 14 / 26(2) human-oversight design draft: readiness, named roles, override/stop, bias guards.
Coverage and known limits
- Art. 14 / 26(2) draft
- Named overseer gaps
- Override & stop path
- Decision-support
What does OversightKit do?
You describe your deployment and get an oversight design draft covering who can intervene, the stop and override path, and named-overseer gaps.
Who is it for?
Deployers of high-risk AI systems who must assign human oversight to competent persons.
What do you get?
An Article 14 and 26(2) design draft, named-overseer gaps, and an override and stop path.
What are the limits?
It designs oversight. Appointing and training the overseer remain yours.
The short version
- Article 14 and 26(2) design draft
- Named-overseer gap flags
- Override and stop path
What people ask before relying on it
What is OversightKit?
A draft generator for EU AI Act human-oversight design under Articles 14 and 26(2).
Who should use it?
Deployers who must assign human oversight to competent persons.
Does it appoint an overseer?
No. It drafts the design and flags the named-overseer gap.
What inputs do I need?
Who operates the system and what intervention is technically possible.
Does it verify competence?
No. It flags the gap for you to close.
Built by Xingliang Li · LX Micro-SaaS Factory — a one-person, curated set of tight-vertical AI tools. How tools are selected →